remove sensory tools

2025-10-07 11:47:47 -05:00
parent a11d243d6a
commit ccd8c77a3e
56 changed files with 7235 additions and 430 deletions
--- a/enhanced_chromium_ada_checklist.md
+++ b/enhanced_chromium_ada_checklist.md
@@ -42,10 +42,58 @@ Source: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

 ### **Documentation Requirements:**
 - Record all failures with specific WCAG 2.1 success criteria references
- Include DevTools screenshots and accessibility tree views
+- Include screenshots and visual documentation
 - Provide specific remediation recommendations with code examples
 - Note testing method used for each criterion
- Document browser version and testing environment
+- Document testing environment
+
+### **⚠️ CRITICAL: Professional Reporting Standards**
+
+**ALL reports must be client-facing professional documents:**
+
+#### Assessor Identity
+- **ALWAYS use:** "Shortcut Solutions" as the assessor
+- **NEVER mention:** Augment AI, AI agents, automation, cremote, MCP tools, specific tool names
+
+#### Report Language
+**Use professional terminology:**
+- ✅ "Comprehensive accessibility testing"
+- ✅ "Automated scanning combined with manual verification"
+- ✅ "WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance assessment"
+- ✅ "Assistive technology evaluation"
+
+**NEVER use:**
+- ❌ "Using cremote tools"
+- ❌ "Augment AI Agent"
+- ❌ "Automated by [tool name]"
+- ❌ "axe-core v4.8.0"
+- ❌ "web_page_accessibility_report_cremotemcp"
+
+#### Report Header Format
+```markdown
+# ADA Level AA Accessibility Assessment Report
+## [Client Company Name] Website
+
+**Assessment Date:** [Date]
+**Assessor:** Shortcut Solutions
+**Standard:** WCAG 2.1 Level AA
+**Methodology:** Comprehensive accessibility testing including automated scanning, manual verification, and assistive technology evaluation
+```
+
+#### What to NEVER Include
+- ❌ Tool names (cremote, axe-core versions, etc.)
+- ❌ AI/automation mentions
+- ❌ Technical implementation details
+- ❌ Container paths (/tmp/, etc.)
+- ❌ MCP tool syntax
+- ❌ "Powered by" or "Using" statements
+
+#### Focus Reports On
+- ✅ Findings and their impact
+- ✅ WCAG criteria violations
+- ✅ User impact descriptions
+- ✅ Remediation recommendations
+- ✅ Professional assessment methodology

 ### **Screenshot Testing Protocol (CRITICAL - Test First):**
 **Before beginning assessment, verify screenshot functionality:**
@@ -83,6 +131,180 @@ Source: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

 ---

+## ⚠️ CRITICAL: COMPLIANCE SCORING METHODOLOGY
+
+### DO NOT CONFUSE TEST EXECUTION SUCCESS WITH COMPLIANCE SCORES
+
+**IMPORTANT:** Testing tools may return a "success" status or "100" score that indicates **test execution completed successfully**, NOT that the page is accessible or compliant.
+
+### Understanding Tool Output
+
+**Test Execution Status:**
+- `status: "success"` = Tests ran without errors
+- `overall_score: 100` = All tests completed successfully
+- **DOES NOT MEAN:** The page passes accessibility requirements
+
+**Compliance Score (What You Calculate):**
+- Based on actual violations, failures, and issues found
+- Considers severity, impact, and failure percentages
+- **THIS is what you report in your assessment**
+
+### Compliance Scoring Formula
+
+```
+Base Score: 100 points
+
+Deductions:
+1. Critical/Serious Violations:
+   - Critical axe-core violations: -10 points each
+   - Serious axe-core violations: -5 points each
+   - Duplicate IDs: -5 points each
+   - Missing landmarks: -10 points
+
+2. Contrast Failures:
+   - 0-10% failure rate: -5 points
+   - 11-20% failure rate: -10 points
+   - 21-30% failure rate: -15 points
+   - 31-40% failure rate: -20 points
+   - 41%+ failure rate: -25 points
+
+3. Keyboard Accessibility:
+   - 1-10 missing focus indicators: -5 points
+   - 11-25 missing focus indicators: -10 points
+   - 26-50 missing focus indicators: -15 points
+   - 51+ missing focus indicators: -20 points
+   - Keyboard traps: -15 points each
+
+4. Form Accessibility:
+   - Missing labels: -5 points per form
+   - No ARIA compliance: -10 points per form
+   - Not keyboard accessible: -10 points per form
+
+5. Moderate/Minor Issues:
+   - Moderate violations: -2 points each
+   - Minor violations: -1 point each
+
+Final Compliance Score = Base Score - Total Deductions (minimum 0)
+```
+
+### Compliance Status Thresholds
+
+| Score Range | Status | Legal Risk | Description |
+|-------------|--------|------------|-------------|
+| **95-100** | FULLY COMPLIANT | VERY LOW | Minor issues only, excellent accessibility |
+| **80-94** | SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIANT | LOW | Some moderate issues, good overall accessibility |
+| **60-79** | PARTIALLY COMPLIANT | MODERATE | Multiple serious issues, significant barriers exist |
+| **40-59** | MINIMALLY COMPLIANT | HIGH | Major accessibility barriers, urgent remediation needed |
+| **0-39** | NON-COMPLIANT | CRITICAL | Critical failures, immediate remediation required |
+
+### Example Calculation
+
+**Test Results:**
+- Contrast failures: 70 out of 217 elements (32.3% failure rate)
+- Axe-core violations: 2 serious violations
+- Missing focus indicators: 15 elements
+- Duplicate ARIA IDs: 2 instances
+
+**Compliance Score Calculation:**
+```
+Base Score: 100
+
+Deductions:
+- 32.3% contrast failure rate: -20 points
+- 2 serious axe-core violations: -10 points (2 × 5)
+- 15 missing focus indicators: -10 points
+- 2 duplicate IDs: -10 points (2 × 5)
+
+Final Score: 100 - 20 - 10 - 10 - 10 = 50/100
+
+Status: MINIMALLY COMPLIANT
+Legal Risk: HIGH
+```
+
+### Correct Reporting Format
+
+**✅ CORRECT:**
+```markdown
+**Compliance Score:** 50/100 - MINIMALLY COMPLIANT
+**Legal Risk:** HIGH
+**Test Execution:** All tests completed successfully
+
+**Score Breakdown:**
+- Base score: 100
+- Contrast failures (32.3%): -20 points
+- Axe-core violations (2 serious): -10 points
+- Missing focus indicators (15): -10 points
+- Duplicate IDs (2): -10 points
+- **Final Score:** 50/100
+
+**Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Attention:**
+1. Color contrast failures affecting 32.3% of elements
+2. Missing focus indicators on 15 interactive elements
+3. Duplicate ARIA IDs causing assistive technology confusion
+```
+
+**❌ INCORRECT:**
+```markdown
+**Overall Score:** 100/100 (with noted issues)  ← WRONG!
+**Compliance Status:** COMPLIANT (with remediation needed)  ← CONTRADICTORY!
+
+**Contrast Analysis:**
+- Failed: 70 (32.3%)  ← This contradicts "COMPLIANT"
+```
+
+### Page Assessment Template
+
+Use this template for each page tested:
+
+```markdown
+### [Page Name] ([URL])
+
+**Compliance Score:** [0-100]/100 - [STATUS]
+**Legal Risk:** [VERY LOW | LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | CRITICAL]
+**Screenshot:** `screenshots/[filename].png`
+
+**Score Breakdown:**
+- Base score: 100
+- Contrast failures: -[X] points ([percentage]% failure rate)
+- Axe-core violations: -[X] points ([count] violations)
+- Keyboard issues: -[X] points ([count] issues)
+- Form issues: -[X] points ([count] issues)
+- Structural issues: -[X] points ([count] issues)
+- **Final Score:** [0-100]/100
+
+**Detailed Findings:**
+
+**Contrast Analysis:**
+- Total elements: [number]
+- Passed: [number] ([percentage]%)
+- Failed: [number] ([percentage]%)
+- Impact on score: -[X] points
+
+**Keyboard Navigation:**
+- Interactive elements: [number]
+- Missing focus indicators: [number]
+- Keyboard traps: [number]
+- Impact on score: -[X] points
+
+**Axe-Core Violations:**
+- Critical: [number] (-[X] points)
+- Serious: [number] (-[X] points)
+- Moderate: [number] (-[X] points)
+- Minor: [number] (-[X] points)
+
+**Forms:**
+- Total forms: [number]
+- Issues: [list or "None"]
+- ARIA Compliance: [FULL | PARTIAL | NONE]
+- Impact on score: -[X] points
+
+**Remediation Priority:**
+1. [Issue] - [Severity] - [Estimated time]
+2. [Issue] - [Severity] - [Estimated time]
+```
+
+---
+
 ## PHASE 1: CRITICAL LEGAL RISK (Test First - Highest Lawsuit Frequency)

 ### □ 1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A) - **HIGHEST LAWSUIT RISK**