238 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
238 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
# Cremote Extraction vs WordPress API - Comparison
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document compares two approaches for extracting Divi page data:
|
|
1. **WordPress API** (current tools)
|
|
2. **Cremote Browser Automation** (proposed tools)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Comparison Table
|
|
|
|
| Feature | WordPress API | Cremote Browser | Winner |
|
|
|---------|---------------|-----------------|--------|
|
|
| **Access Requirements** | WordPress credentials | Public URL only | 🏆 Cremote |
|
|
| **Extraction Accuracy** | 100% | 70-80% | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Structure Extraction** | Perfect | Very Good | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Content Extraction** | Perfect | Perfect | Tie |
|
|
| **Styling Extraction** | Perfect | Good | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Image Extraction** | Perfect | Perfect | Tie |
|
|
| **Advanced Settings** | Yes | No | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Responsive Settings** | Yes | No | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Custom CSS** | Yes | No | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Animation Settings** | Yes | No | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Works on External Sites** | No | Yes | 🏆 Cremote |
|
|
| **Setup Time** | 5-10 minutes | 0 minutes | 🏆 Cremote |
|
|
| **Extraction Speed** | Fast (1-2 sec) | Fast (10-30 sec) | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Reliability** | Very High | High | WordPress API |
|
|
| **Maintenance** | Low | Low | Tie |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Use Case Matrix
|
|
|
|
| Scenario | Best Approach | Why |
|
|
|----------|---------------|-----|
|
|
| **Own site with API access** | WordPress API | 100% accuracy, all settings |
|
|
| **Client site with credentials** | WordPress API | Full access to builder data |
|
|
| **External site (no access)** | Cremote | Only option available |
|
|
| **Quick preview/demo** | Cremote | No setup required |
|
|
| **Production migration** | WordPress API | Need perfect accuracy |
|
|
| **Competitive analysis** | Cremote | No access to competitor sites |
|
|
| **Bulk site analysis** | Cremote | Can scan many sites quickly |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Detailed Comparison
|
|
|
|
### WordPress API Approach
|
|
|
|
#### Advantages ✅
|
|
- **100% accuracy** - Gets exact builder data
|
|
- **All settings** - Animations, responsive, custom CSS
|
|
- **Advanced modules** - Forms, sliders, galleries fully configured
|
|
- **Dynamic content** - ACF fields, WooCommerce data
|
|
- **Fast extraction** - Direct database access
|
|
- **Reliable** - No browser dependencies
|
|
|
|
#### Disadvantages ❌
|
|
- **Requires credentials** - Need WordPress admin access
|
|
- **Setup time** - Must configure API access
|
|
- **Limited scope** - Only works on sites you control
|
|
- **Security concerns** - Sharing credentials
|
|
- **Not scalable** - Can't analyze competitor sites
|
|
|
|
#### Current Tools
|
|
```
|
|
analyze_page_structure_divi5
|
|
extract_images_divi5
|
|
extract_text_content_divi5
|
|
extract_module_data_divi5
|
|
get_page_content_divi5
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Cremote Browser Approach
|
|
|
|
#### Advantages ✅
|
|
- **No credentials needed** - Works on any public site
|
|
- **Zero setup** - Just provide URL
|
|
- **Scalable** - Can analyze many sites
|
|
- **Competitive analysis** - Study competitor sites
|
|
- **Fast deployment** - No configuration required
|
|
- **Safe** - No security concerns
|
|
|
|
#### Disadvantages ❌
|
|
- **70-80% accuracy** - Missing advanced settings
|
|
- **No animations** - Can't extract animation configs
|
|
- **No responsive** - Only desktop settings
|
|
- **No custom CSS** - Builder CSS not visible
|
|
- **Complex modules** - Forms/sliders need manual config
|
|
- **Slower** - Browser automation overhead
|
|
|
|
#### Proposed Tools
|
|
```
|
|
extract_divi_page_structure_cremote
|
|
extract_divi_images_cremote
|
|
extract_divi_backgrounds_cremote
|
|
download_and_map_images_cremote
|
|
recreate_page_from_cremote_data
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Accuracy Breakdown
|
|
|
|
### WordPress API: 100%
|
|
```
|
|
✅ Structure: 100%
|
|
✅ Content: 100%
|
|
✅ Styling: 100%
|
|
✅ Images: 100%
|
|
✅ Advanced Settings: 100%
|
|
✅ Responsive: 100%
|
|
✅ Animations: 100%
|
|
✅ Custom CSS: 100%
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Cremote Browser: 70-80%
|
|
```
|
|
✅ Structure: 100%
|
|
✅ Content: 100%
|
|
✅ Styling: 90%
|
|
✅ Images: 100%
|
|
❌ Advanced Settings: 0%
|
|
❌ Responsive: 0%
|
|
❌ Animations: 0%
|
|
❌ Custom CSS: 0%
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## When to Use Each
|
|
|
|
### Use WordPress API When:
|
|
1. You have admin access to the source site
|
|
2. You need 100% accuracy
|
|
3. You need all advanced settings
|
|
4. You're doing production migrations
|
|
5. You need responsive configurations
|
|
6. You need animation settings
|
|
|
|
### Use Cremote When:
|
|
1. You DON'T have access to source site
|
|
2. You're analyzing competitor sites
|
|
3. You need quick previews/demos
|
|
4. You're doing bulk site analysis
|
|
5. 70-80% accuracy is acceptable
|
|
6. You can manually configure advanced features
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Hybrid Approach
|
|
|
|
### Best of Both Worlds
|
|
For sites you control, use BOTH approaches:
|
|
|
|
1. **WordPress API** - Get complete data
|
|
2. **Cremote** - Validate rendered output
|
|
3. **Compare** - Ensure accuracy
|
|
4. **Recreate** - Use best data source
|
|
|
|
### Workflow
|
|
```
|
|
IF has_wordpress_access THEN
|
|
use_wordpress_api()
|
|
validate_with_cremote()
|
|
ELSE
|
|
use_cremote()
|
|
document_limitations()
|
|
END IF
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Migration Scenarios
|
|
|
|
### Scenario 1: Full Migration (Own Site)
|
|
**Approach:** WordPress API
|
|
**Accuracy:** 100%
|
|
**Time:** 5 minutes
|
|
**Manual Work:** 0%
|
|
|
|
### Scenario 2: Competitor Analysis
|
|
**Approach:** Cremote
|
|
**Accuracy:** 70-80%
|
|
**Time:** 10 minutes
|
|
**Manual Work:** 20-30%
|
|
|
|
### Scenario 3: Client Site (No Access Yet)
|
|
**Approach:** Cremote → WordPress API
|
|
**Accuracy:** 70-80% → 100%
|
|
**Time:** 10 min → 5 min
|
|
**Manual Work:** 20-30% → 0%
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Recommendation
|
|
|
|
### Implement BOTH Approaches
|
|
|
|
#### Phase 1: Cremote Tools (Priority)
|
|
- Enables external site extraction
|
|
- Fills critical gap in capabilities
|
|
- High impact for competitive analysis
|
|
|
|
#### Phase 2: Enhance WordPress API Tools
|
|
- Already working well
|
|
- Add more extraction options
|
|
- Improve performance
|
|
|
|
#### Phase 3: Hybrid Workflow
|
|
- Combine both approaches
|
|
- Automatic fallback logic
|
|
- Best accuracy possible
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
**Both approaches are valuable:**
|
|
|
|
- **WordPress API** = Perfect accuracy, limited scope
|
|
- **Cremote** = Good accuracy, unlimited scope
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Implement cremote tools to complement existing WordPress API tools, giving users the best of both worlds.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ Implement cremote extraction tools
|
|
2. ✅ Keep WordPress API tools as-is
|
|
3. ✅ Add automatic approach selection
|
|
4. ✅ Document when to use each
|
|
5. ✅ Create hybrid workflows
|